2 ms·

“I know the answer but I’m so smart that I won’t explain it” is equally useless.

• stouset 3y ago
  You might wish to reread the comments in reply to you—in good faith this time—and realize that people have in fact tried to explain it to you. Perhaps you were too busy knocking over chess pieces and strutting around on the board victoriously to notice?
  • jakear 3y ago
    Still haven’t seen a mechanism by which we can export entropy at hypernatural rates. Which is all I’ve been asking for, in multiple sub threads. But sure, pop off on the metaphors. They truly showcase your heightened intellect. We should all strive to write metaphors as thoughtlessly as you.
    • uoaei 3y ago
      The point that literally everyone's been making, quite clearly and coherently, is that there is no need to develop special methods to export "entropy" if you just generate it slowly enough, i.e., sustainably. Your sass is even more embarrassing considering that you've missed this very basic point every time someone has patiently explained it to you. Further, your focus on entropy is misguided and ultimately irrelevant. Thermal energy is only proportional to entropy in the equilibrium setting but as has been made painfully clear by now Earth is an open system that is always far from equilibrium, so obviously it's not a very useful factor to consider.