3 ms·

Because it was ripped apart fairly quickly.

• xupybd 3y ago
  I would have thought that would have made some noise. I'm not saying I think it's correct. I'm saying it's shocking and I'd have thought would have at least stirred up some publicity.
  • uoaei 3y ago
    There's no publicity needed to contradict a paper which wasn't publicized in the first place.
    • xupybd 3y ago
      None needed, correct. But it's common for shocking things to generate publicity.
      • uoaei 3y ago
        No, it's common for publicized things to be shocking. Yours is a classic error in Bayesian reasoning.
        • xupybd 3y ago
          I bet you're fun at parties.
          • uoaei 3y ago
            Love how it always ends with an insult with you people.
            • xupybd 3y ago
              I'm not sure who the people group is that you're assigning to me. But if your were wondering why I reacted this way. I felt that you were needling me. "I bet you're fun at parties" is a way of saying you're being too pedantic. It wasn't meant to hurt your feelings up it's a way of pushing back. Yes your correct but did you're not being very gracious about it.
              • uoaei 3y ago
                It's generally easier in these situations if the person who is wrong doesn't continue reaching for ways to feel right by imposing some self-serving notion of "grace".
                • deleted 3y ago
                  [deleted]
                • deleted 3y ago
                  [deleted]