I've been using it to refactor Clojure codes and port Scheme examples into Clojure. Maybe because Lisps have very low syntax, I find I can just copy off functi

I've been using it to refactor Clojure codes and port Scheme examples into Clojure. Maybe because Lisps have very low syntax, I find I can just copy off function/macro definitions as context and GPT3.5 can rewrite the code into something I can use... And by testing in a REPL (in :dev) I can instantly see which code has hallucinations and which work perfectly. Tbh I find it hallucinates mainly when dealing with mutable states (e.g. atoms) or with pipelines of complex maps transformed by multimethods - Just using small data bits and normal pure functions make GPT3.5 work perfectly because it doesn't need to take into account code outside the 2048-4096 tokens it's thinking right now?