Is neutrality essential to your moral philosophy? Please define neutrality. Do you think it should be essential to someone who works at Wikipedia? Even after t

Is neutrality essential to your moral philosophy? Please define neutrality. Do you think it should be essential to someone who works at Wikipedia? Even after they leave? Why exactly? Make the argument if you want to persuade. I think I speak for a lot of people in saying that such a claim is overly strict. Have you reviewed various forms of moral relativism recently? If not, I think the ideas will be fruitful. There is an idea that I’ve stolen from Robert Kane (a philosopher) that I want to share any chance I get: a quest for knowledge means starting with an open mind — but it does not mean stopping there. Neutrality can help you weigh ideas more objectively. But the process of weighing them will show that some ideas are better than others. Therefore, neutrality as an end state of knowledge or ethics is not a wise goal. Foolish neutrality is unethical.