3 ms·
Reminds me of the movie '12 monkeys', where the groups determined to save the world ended up destroying it. Would be funny in a way if GreenPeace's actual acco
by mensetmanusman 3y ago
Reminds me of the movie '12 monkeys', where the groups determined to save the world ended up destroying it.
Would be funny in a way if GreenPeace's actual accomplishment was delaying nuclear until it was too late.
- aksss 3y agoIsn’t that precisely the course correction we find ourselves having to make now? Decades of anti-nuclear sentiment calcified into regulatory opposition that needs to be unwound. Yeah, real funny. If there’s a lesson here we should all take to heart, it’s this: beware of letting bandwagon sentimental movements dictate policy.
- cycomanic 3y agoNuclear is not a solution that will save us. In fact it is counterproductive to build nuclear. I know it hurts the sensibilities of many of the technerds here on HN, but renewables are already several factors cheaper than nuclear and are still on an exponential cost reduction curve. So if you build a nuclear power plant you have less CO2 reduction than if you use the money for renewables. And no we don't need nuclear for baseload (hint renewables are baseload) and nuclear costs are not dominated by regulation any more than other power sources (Nuclear had >50 years, of development and government subsidies, that's 30 more than solar. And they still did not get onto an exponential cost reduction rate).