4 ms·
I think it is counterproductive to limit the rate of growth of AI since some countries — typically the ones who are less concerned about ethics — will not follo
by BeenAGoodUser 3y ago
I think it is counterproductive to limit the rate of growth of AI since some countries — typically the ones who are less concerned about ethics — will not follow those rules and could gain a considerable edge over the rest of the world this way.
- generic92034 3y agoOr they are the first countries falling to the superintelligent AIs they themselves have developed... :o
- Jackson__ 3y ago... with the rest of the world following shortly.
- standardUser 3y agoHistorically, technologically advanced nations have worked together to develop some limited governance over sensitive technologies. It's an imperfect system, but tends to be better than a free-for-all.
- cubefox 3y agoCounterexample: Atom bombs, ICMBs, spy satellites.
- standardUser 3y agoYou literally just named the actual examples.
- __loam 3y agoI think this argument is frankly quite ignorant. The only adversarial nations that maybe have the capability to build these systems are Russia and China. Russia just got sanctioned to hell and the Chinese government is limiting their AI development more than we are. By far the most gung ho country about developing AI is the United States and its tech sector. Bringing up the CCP strawman is just an excuse for less government oversight over what the industry itself has been saying is a dangerous technology for months now.