>> I think the word “law” is a little misleading in this case: International law is more like international diplomacy LARPing as law. >> That said, never found

>> I think the word “law” is a little misleading in this case: International law is more like international diplomacy LARPing as law. >> That said, never found a better word for it, so maybe it’s correct. > Per the constitution treaties are binding with the force of federal law. 1) I think that's controversial, or at least not so simple. IIRC, there's a question in US law if treaties have domestic force on their own, or must be implemented by "enabling legislation." 2) In any case, the US Constitution can't make "international law" international law, at best it makes a treaty domestic US law.