3 ms·
I hate the whole web paradigm but it's what's in use and it's definitely improving. And in particular, jQuery makes it less painful so that's what many of us us
by alecco 15y ago
I hate the whole web paradigm but it's what's in use and it's definitely improving. And in particular, jQuery makes it less painful so that's what many of us use (or similar JS frameworks). The same problem happens at the low end with the x86 instruction set. Yet we live with it.
None of that makes it OK to write a bashful title that should've read "Stop paying your ASP MVC JS tax" or something. It all comes down on how they need to have inlined JS requiring $(document).ready(). That's the problem and not jQuery.
- astine 15y ago'None of that makes it OK to write a bashful title that should've read "Stop paying your ASP MVC JS tax" or something. ' "Bashful" means "shy," not "full of bash," as you seem to think. Actually, I wonder if you speak English natively as you seem to be the only person who interpreted the article the way you did.
- alecco 15y agoYou are right, I meant to use "bashing". I do not speak english natively. But that has nothing to do with the bashing title. There is no "jQuery tax", that's a misleading statement.
- bmelton 15y agoHe doesn't suggest that there IS a "jQuery tax", rather that people's common misuse of jQuery imposes a tax on page rendering.