3 ms·
>Are you saying that the problem with seniority is that it clearly solves Sarcastic quips like this do not promote a productive discussion. The commenter above
by scythe 3y ago
>Are you saying that the problem with seniority is that it clearly solves
Sarcastic quips like this do not promote a productive discussion. The commenter above is probably arguing that the oldest use is not necessarily the most valuable, and relying on stack allocation fails to make the most economically effective use of a limited resource.
- s1artibartfast 3y agoI wasn't being sarcastic. They replied the following in a discussion about seniority causing allocation problems. >Basically there is no need for allocation at all. They might be saying what you did, but it was far from clear to me. If so, my response would be pretty straightforward: Seniority settles the question of rights. Buying and selling of rights and water is a very clear and effective way of putting them to the most effective economic use. If a potential user wants water and can put it to better use, they can simply buy it. If they are the city or state, they can even use eminent domain to force the sale.