3 ms·
It's a really thin article. It fails to say how "topological solitons" are different from wave-mechanical solitons, nor does it explain why they look like black
by denton-scratch 3y ago
It's a really thin article. It fails to say how "topological solitons" are different from wave-mechanical solitons, nor does it explain why they look like black holes, or why they lack an event horizon.
I'm routinely disappointed with phys.org. It's pop-sci with the "-sci" component reduced to a remnant.
- marricks 3y ago100% agree. It does link to an actual paper which is a step up from blogspam https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.107.084042 https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.107.084042