3 ms·
> The compliance costs are absolutely enormous and EU member state national courts are leading to rule virtually every tech product being in noncompliance with
by chpatrick 3y ago
> The compliance costs are absolutely enormous and EU member state national courts are leading to rule virtually every tech product being in noncompliance with it, as it so broad.
Isn't that intended?
- phatfish 3y agoLets face it, an above average number of people commenting here work in covertly monetizing our personal data, as there seems to be quite a few of them rubbed the wrong way by the GDPR I can only conclude it's working rather well.
- input_sh 3y agoThat's a significant group of people for sure, but I'd add two more groups: - A group that think GDPR = cookie law and there's nothing more written in it. Never any discussion about, say, forcing companies to report a data breach within 72h of detection. Or about being able to download your data, or forcing a company to remove your data, or... - A group that think passing a new law = everyone is going to comply immediately and one random website that they know of that doesn't comply but wasn't sued yet into submission = GDPR was a mistake.
- CamperBob2 3y ago"There's no way to rule honest men..."
- jacobr1 3y agoNot really. The ideal is to have companies that are delivering functionality while still respecting user's data rights. Apple's products are probably the closest to this ideal, given their incentives aren't about harvesting user data to sell ads. I'm sure there are some techno-alarmists that would like to either shut everything or significantly slow the pace of innovation - but the broader vision is one of delivering both value and safety without unreasonable overhead.