> “The justices passed on their chance to clarify that Section 230 is not a get-out-of-jail-free card for online platforms when they cause harm,” Durbin said.

> “The justices passed on their chance to clarify that Section 230 is not a get-out-of-jail-free card for online platforms when they cause harm,” Durbin said. The court basically ruled that the platforms didn't cause harm in these cases. How do you rule what happens when platforms cause harm when in the case you are ruling on doesn't include the platforms causing harm?