How is such a stance not itself sanctimonious? Open dialogue is the only way to change what you perceive to be the issue here - either by correcting misconcept

How is such a stance not itself sanctimonious? Open dialogue is the only way to change what you perceive to be the issue here - either by correcting misconceptions about the original intent or providing perspective to the originator of what otherwise sounds like a pretty good idea. Ironically, this kind of refusal to engage because of perceived imperfections that somehow nullify all else is really the kind of unhealthy thinking that is most amplified in modern online discourse and arguably leads to posts like this one. Growth is a collective process, and doesn’t happen in a vacuum.