3 ms·
I have zero issues if parsers choose to do this but I wouldn’t argue that it shouldn’t be a required part of the specification. If comments need to be preserved
by hnlmorg 3y ago
I have zero issues if parsers choose to do this but I wouldn’t argue that it shouldn’t be a required part of the specification. If comments need to be preserved then they’re part of the schema and should be a (for example) string field rather than comment.
- eviks 3y agoWhat's the connection? They can't be a string field because semantically they're tied to another field they're commenting, and they need to be preserved because that info is valuable Why do you require conversion in this use case?