> So it certainly was "worth" that when the transaction happened. Right, but it's also fair to say that in retrospect that the "worth" at the time of the trans

> So it certainly was "worth" that when the transaction happened. Right, but it's also fair to say that in retrospect that the "worth" at the time of the transaction was incorrect since it was based on an estimated prediction of the future (as you said), which ended up being wrong.