3 ms·
This is an issue that’s very context specific. The content matters. The age matters. There are videos on social media of books that are very much “NC-17” given
by pyuser583 3y ago
This is an issue that’s very context specific. The content matters. The age matters.
There are videos on social media of books that are very much “NC-17” given to kids in middle school.
- jfengel 3y agoI would be inherently suspicious of videos. They are poor ways to engage critically with something. They can engage in exaggeration, misrepresentation, and outright lies, and you can't easily check them. It would be so much more believable to just provide a link to the publisher or Amazon. But it's so easy to make a video and have people repeat the accusation.
- pyuser583 3y agoYou can’t link to part of a book.
- birdyrooster 3y agoI don't think a book can be rated NC-17.
- laratied 3y agoThe alternative though is pornhub. I see a study from 2017 "Study on Australians ages 15-29 found that 100% of the men (82% of women) had viewed porn." No shocker there but: "Also, 69 percent of males and 23 percent of females first viewed porn at age 13 or younger." Just one of those things that makes me love being child free. No clue what you do in this situation.
- pyuser583 3y agoAge inappropriate instructional materials don’t serve as a shield against harm from pornography. Is there any research that increasing the level of explicitness and detail for younger ages increases benefit or mitigates harm?
- potsandpans 3y agoproof.