8 ms·
Those poor landlords shouldn't have made risky investments. Thoughts and prayers. It also sounds like there's a lot more value saved by not having an office do
by calvinmorrison 3y ago
Those poor landlords shouldn't have made risky investments. Thoughts and prayers.
It also sounds like there's a lot more value saved by not having an office downtown with more money to be spend on QoL improvements than renting office space
- idopmstuff 3y agoThe problem isn't the effect on the landlords - it's the effect on everybody else. > more money to be spend on QoL improvements than renting office space Who is going to spend money on QoL improvements? The corporations who would've spent it on office space will keep it as profits, not invest it in the city of San Francisco. The city will have much less money to spend on QoL because of greatly diminished tax revenue.
- calvinmorrison 3y agoAssuming somehow spending money on rent is a more efficient allocation of resources than profits is absurd. For us without an office we're able to hire several more team members and embrace fully remote with east and west coast staff allowing us to expand our service coverage an additional 3 hours without having to ask team members to work outside of normal hours