How about judging the content no matter which tools the students are using? If ChatGPT output cannot be distinguished from a student's output, then the respecti

How about judging the content no matter which tools the students are using? If ChatGPT output cannot be distinguished from a student's output, then the respective profession / line of study is soon going to be obsolete anyway. If there is a difference (there should be one!), then the LLM is used as a tool, which should be allowed for most purposes. Universities don't disallow style and grammar correction software like Grammarly either. What I can see in the humanities at least is that evaluation will soon get away from subjective and superficial criteria of form and focus on the quality of the content again. (That's me being optimistic. The other alternative is that AI will soon evaluate the output of other AIs.)