3 ms·
One argument I've heard is that you're being paid in meaningfulness (in addition to the money). And that's why it works out (ethically speaking).
by swayvil 3y ago
One argument I've heard is that you're being paid in meaningfulness (in addition to the money). And that's why it works out (ethically speaking).
- gonzo41 3y agoLet's see how paying the rent with vibes works out eh.
- mrangle 3y agoThat's not an ethics argument. As could be inferred by the fact that it is in favor of paying a lesser amount tangible property due to the arguable benefit of an intangible concept that no one owns. However, meaningfullness can't be accounted for given any individual teacher. Some hate their job, just as in every other profession. Instead, it's a justification for offering less property for work. It is not dissimilar, and may be ethically worse, to the hypothetical justification to lessen funding for homeless people: "well, at least they are getting fresh air".