No, we do have a spec[1], but it cannot be as concise as the JSON link posted because the JSON link is mostly only about syntax, and our spec discusses both syn

No, we do have a spec[1], but it cannot be as concise as the JSON link posted because the JSON link is mostly only about syntax, and our spec discusses both syntax and semantics. And of course, we are a much richer language than JSON, with many more features and computational behavior. That being said, it would be nice to use railroad diagrams to describe syntax in our spec. [1] https://cuelang.org/docs/references/spec https://cuelang.org/docs/references/spec