3 ms·
"I can't use it for one particular use case that >99.999...% of users never want to run in the first place, therefore it's not open at all and might as well be
by arp242 3y ago
"I can't use it for one particular use case that >99.999...% of users never want to run in the first place, therefore it's not open at all and might as well be closed source" is quite the take.
- rakoo 3y agoWhy bother then? Using this as a component makes you enter the "a substantial set of the features or functionality of the Licensed Work to third parties as a software-as-a-service, platform-as-a-service, infrastructure-as-a-service or other similar services that compete with Licensor products or services" zone, and it can be interpreted in any way. How do you make sure your product isn't a derivative and is different enough for lawyers?
- arp242 3y agoThis only really applies if you're offering direct access to the Dragonfly wire protocol or something along those lines, not if you're merely using Dragonfly it as part of your product. Building, say, a Twitter clone on Dragonfly is perfectly fine. You're interpreting this exceedingly broad.