> Go ask GPT 4 -- not 3.5 -- what it thinks about elephants flying to the moon. Then, and only them go write a snarky IEEE article. It's hard to know what thin

> Go ask GPT 4 -- not 3.5 -- what it thinks about elephants flying to the moon. Then, and only them go write a snarky IEEE article. It's hard to know what things have been seen in the training data and are only therefore correct. And GPT4 is large enough that it can generalize from learning that x doesn't make sense that y also doesn't make sense. Does that mean it *understands*? Maybe. But it doesn't have persistent state and can't do math. It's definitely not yet what we think of when we say AGI.