3 ms·
This feature isn't for us. Playing Captain Hindsight and telling a regular user "you shouldn't have opened that suspicious attachment" doesn't get their data ba
by lukifer 15y ago
This feature isn't for us. Playing Captain Hindsight and telling a regular user "you shouldn't have opened that suspicious attachment" doesn't get their data back.
Put simply, a computer is a dangerous tool in inexperienced hands, no different than a table saw or a gun. A user has the ability to do serious damage to themselves, by destroying or leaking personal information; adding a reasonable safety feature that is activated by default is not an infringement of your freedom when you have the ability to disable it trivially.
Now, if we're talking the App Store, then I agree with you completely. iOS should behave exactly like Mountain Lion, and if I had my druthers, the level of vendor lock-in they employ on that platform would be considered anti-competitive and illegal. If it turns out that Gatekeeper is merely a stepping stone to similarly walling off the Mac ecosystem, then I suppose I will have to eat my words.
- astrodust 15y agoFor anyone who manages "IT" for their relatives, I'm sure they'll upgrade to Mountain Lion and lock down the application execution to "App Store and Signed Only" right away. Some people have a talent for getting malware on anything.
- Tyrannosaurs 15y agoI'd actually like a setting that says "Install nothing, change nothing, bloody leave it all alone" for my Dad's computer.
- jonny_eh 15y agoThat'd be nice but the "App Store Only" option should be pretty damn close.