2 ms·
Yeah a lot of times is right, unless they are really complex subjects then maybe even less then 50
by m3kw9 3y ago
Yeah a lot of times is right, unless they are really complex subjects then maybe even less then 50
- munchler 3y agoWhich is true for many humans as well.
- thorum 3y agoLess about complexity than about how well-documented the subject is on the internet IMO. I’ve been using it to help me set up and troubleshoot AWS Elastic Kubernetes clusters, which are plenty complex, and I’d estimate it’s been around 95% accurate. (And for at least one of the times it seemed to be wrong, it turned out I’d made a mistake following its instructions...)
- galaxyLogic 3y agoYou could ask me a difficult scientific question which I wouldn't even understand. But I could google and find a scientific paper which I would pass to you. You could say fantastic answer, thanks. But I would have no clue as to whether it is or is not. Now if I could just do that fast enough to serve all the people all the time, you would call me a sensation. I think this is what's happening with LLMs.