5 ms·
It is a disruption. It now has more wood behind the arrow. You can’t ignore it just because it lies today for some inputs.
by quickthrower2 3y ago
It is a disruption. It now has more wood behind the arrow. You can’t ignore it just because it lies today for some inputs.
- grugagag 3y agoMaybe, but the rest of the arrow is not more chat gpt but other AI things to come. The problem I currently see is the hype, we’re acting as if we’re already there, we’ve nearly achieved AGI with LLMs, we just need to ramp up production more and miraculously AGI will pop into existence
- Gigachad 3y agoFeels like there have been a lot of previous technologies where the last 10% was far more complex than the first 90%. Self driving cars were pretty much solved a decade ago, and yet we still aren't there yet. VR was pretty much working and ready to change the world a decade ago, and we still aren't there yet. So it's hard to tell if this is an iphone moment where it just rockets off in to space and changes the world. Or if it's something that will always be "not quite there yet"
- jstx1 3y agoThe difference is that GPT-4 is already useful even in its current imperfect form. It’s not a 90% thing that needs to get to 100% for us to use it.
- Gigachad 3y agoVR is useful in its current form. Self driving tech is being used for lots of assistance feature. They just haven’t changed the world yet.
- jstx1 3y agoIn their current state VR and self driving aren’t on the same level of usefulness as LLMs, not even close.
- goatlover 3y agoThe context is AGI, not whether it's useful tool.