I find it interesting how easily people take evidence at face value. It's incredibly easy to poke holes in the debunking of all this. 1. U-Boats couldn't get t

I find it interesting how easily people take evidence at face value. It's incredibly easy to poke holes in the debunking of all this. 1. U-Boats couldn't get through sea ice to Antarctica: what if they were modified? What if the specs for u-boats used to assert this was wrong? What if there was a path through the sea ice that was classified? The list goes on forever 2. SAS men in the region at the time had civilian jobs: Says who? At a glance they're basing this off of civilian contracts with these men's names on them. This is easily faked 3. Operation Highjump was designed to train the US Navy for a possible war with the Soviet Union in the Arctic: Again, says who? Based on documentation provided by the government themselves? Ultimately it boils down to this: "Activities that were classified have subsequently been declassified" Given how much subterfuge and psyops the US government has provably done throughout its history, doctoring and faking declassified documents is something they have assuredly done. There is definitely a long, rich history of destroying documents.