> It's amazing how the confident tone lends credibility to all of that made-up nonsense. Almost impossible for anybody without knowledge of the book to believe

> It's amazing how the confident tone lends credibility to all of that made-up nonsense. Almost impossible for anybody without knowledge of the book to believe that those "facts" aren't authorititative and well researched. To me this is the single biggest problem with the technology, but I guess also the one that is the most "human". People that have no idea what they are talking about, speaking or publishing in an authoritative tone. The difference is when a human does it you can usually fairly easily look into their published history, education background and other characteristics about the individual to see if they can safely be ignored. These models remove that ability and are generally "correct enough" most of the time that can make feel like it's more dangerous.