19 ms·
I'm very pleasantly surprised by this. I've always been a bit cynical about Basecamp's success, but I think this new version is going to be a genuine game-chang
by andrewingram 15y ago
I'm very pleasantly surprised by this. I've always been a bit cynical about Basecamp's success, but I think this new version is going to be a genuine game-changer.
I really love the sheets idea and I'll love seeing how it works out. I'm already thinking about how I could apply the idea to e-commerce sites, hopefully the interaction isn't patented.
Thinking about it now, I am wondering about a potential limitation. Sheets make sense when you have a fairly consistent starting point, ie the project overview page. But what if you're given a link to say an individual ticket? Do the sheets build up from that ticket as a starting point, rather than the project page, or do they reflect the hierarchy of the site? If it's the later, does that not mean that loading a deep page in the site is burdened by having to also load its parent pages? I assume it would be handled asynchronously, but it still seems like a lot of overhead.
- joedev 15y agoI doubt it is patented. http://twitter.com/#!/dhh/status/168725102538661891 http://twitter.com/#!/dhh/status/168725102538661891
- jasonfried 15y agoThanks Andrew. "But what if you're given a link to say an individual ticket? Do the sheets build up from that ticket as a starting point, rather than the project page, or do they reflect the hierarchy of the site? If it's the later, does that not mean that loading a deep page in the site is burdened by having to also load its parent pages?" We'll write this up in more detail later, but the basic answer is: Every link has a default stack and that default stack is just the project page and that item's page. So if I emailed you a to-do item URL, the stack you would see would be two pages - the project the to-do is in, and the to-do itself. We put loads of time into thinking about all these scenarios. It's all very natural when you use it.
- andrewingram 15y agoThanks for the reply Jason, It all sounds good, looking forward to seeing it!