4 ms·
Same point can be made about anything. Never breaking BC is easier, and more comfortable, but in the end it's slow and inevitable death. If C++ would have clea
by BulgarianIdiot 3y ago
Same point can be made about anything. Never breaking BC is easier, and more comfortable, but in the end it's slow and inevitable death.
If C++ would have cleaned up legacy, Rust wouldn't need to exist for ex.
Java has long had a policy of never breaking BC, but few years ago they started marking packages deprecated for removal. They're very slow and systematic about it, as they should be, but the point is, eventually those packages will be removed. And that's good. It means Java has a future.
- stjohnswarts 3y agoRust is still in the noise vs the amount of market share that C++ has. That said I love it as a language but it's hardly "taking over", I have tried to push it at my company a bit for command line utilities.