3 ms·
I'm not the person you replied to, but in my native tongue (English), excessive repetition is also poor usage. Repeating the question too literally is indicativ
by matthew9219 3y ago
I'm not the person you replied to, but in my native tongue (English), excessive repetition is also poor usage. Repeating the question too literally is indicative of unsophisticated (pre-college) writing, and repeating the same phrases word for word a signal that you don't believe your listener is paying attention to your words (as opposed to rephrasing, which signals that your prior explanation might have been unclear).
I've been a bit shocked how poor ChatGPT's usage is - it writes more like a very articulate 15 year old than like an adult - and how nobody else seems to notice. I can't help but think part of the reason nobody is noticing is that most of the attention is coming from engineers (for whom language is not a top skill).
- revertmean 3y agoEverybody noticed. It's what people mean when they refer to a comment sounding like it was written by ChatGPT. I suspect it's a deliberate choice, much as The Sun newspaper aims at an 8 year old reading level, while newspapers like The Times or Guardian aim at 14 year old. Try asking ChatGPT to shift to a more advanced level. Also, the whole "say what you're going to say, say it, say what you said" technique is very common because it works. Even "smart" people don't remember things quite as well as they think they do.
- guenthert 3y ago> I've been a bit shocked how poor ChatGPT's usage is - it writes more like a very articulate 15 year old than like an adult - and how nobody else seems to notice. No, we're just mesmerized that a freaking machine, a bunch of PCBs and wires, can fairly convincingly impersonate a 15 year old, including making stuff up with great confidence.