3 ms·
This is a well-established and researched part of market failure. It involves the idea of negative externalities, like how a market for heroin creates a social
by SantalBlush 3y ago
This is a well-established and researched part of market failure. It involves the idea of negative externalities, like how a market for heroin creates a social cost that is borne by the general public.
And you're right that a market transaction is the best measure of "good" that we have. To get some sense of "what society might pay" to limit or eliminate such a market, an analyst must resort to more difficult methods like cost-benefit analysis. It's a huge topic and is used by major governments.
- robertlagrant 3y agoIndeed. But given negative externalities are not the job of companies to compute (because they don't get to define them) the establishing and enforcing of non-mark-distorting negative externalities is government's, and it's government's failure when it's not done, or not done well.