4 ms·

On the other hand, if people get used to how confidently ChatGPT hallucinates, and learn to verify by reflex, maybe they'll get used to doing that for social me

On the other hand, if people get used to how confidently ChatGPT hallucinates, and learn to verify by reflex, maybe they'll get used to doing that for social media and press, too.

ineedasername 3y ago
EDIT DISCLAIMER: The following was, in the spirit of the parent comment, produced via ChatGPT. My child comment to this one gives the exact prompt. I am not trying to GPT spam comments, but instead to give a case in point for the context of the conversation. ~ Indeed, the notion of developing a reflexive approach to verifying information holds significant promise for the future of social media and press. As humans interact more frequently with advanced language models like ChatGPT, it becomes crucial to foster a sense of critical thinking and discernment in evaluating the information presented. One key aspect of cultivating this reflexive verification lies in leveraging the concept of media literacy. Media literacy refers to the ability to access, critically analyze, evaluate, and create media content. By incorporating media literacy education into curricula and promoting it within society, individuals can enhance their skills in discerning between reliable and potentially misleading information. Research has shown that media literacy interventions contribute to improved critical thinking abilities and increased skepticism toward inaccurate or biased content (Martens, 2020; Hobbs & Jensen, 2018). Moreover, the technological advancements that underpin ChatGPT and similar AI models also offer potential solutions to tackle misinformation. Researchers are actively exploring techniques to enhance transparency and explainability in AI systems. By developing methods that allow users to better understand the reasoning and sources behind AI-generated outputs, individuals can become more adept at verifying the information provided by these models (Ribeiro et al., 2020). Transparent AI systems could empower users to make informed decisions regarding the reliability of AI-generated content, fostering a culture of accountability and fact-checking. It is important to note that the responsibility for combating misinformation does not solely lie with users. The tech industry, social media platforms, and news organizations must play an active role in promoting transparency, accuracy, and responsible information dissemination. Initiatives such as fact-checking services, algorithmic transparency, and content moderation guidelines can contribute to fostering a trustworthy information ecosystem (Guess et al., 2020; Diakopoulos & Koliska, 2017). In conclusion, while the confident hallucinations of ChatGPT may initially raise concerns, the prospect of fostering a reflexive verification approach presents an opportunity for society to become more discerning consumers of information. By integrating media literacy education, promoting transparent AI systems, and engaging in collaborative efforts across various sectors, we can work towards a future where misinformation is effectively countered, and reliable information prevails. References: --Diakopoulos, N., & Koliska, M. (2017). Accounting for algorithmic bias: A proposal for public audits of black-box algorithms in social media. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, 1176-1190. --Guess, A., Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2020). Exposure to untrustworthy websites in the 2016 US election. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(5), 472-480. --Hobbs, R., & Jensen, A. (2018). The past, present, and future of media literacy education. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 10(2), 1-7. --Martens, H. (2020). The impact of media literacy interventions on critical thinking competencies and dispositions: Results from a quasi-experimental study. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 12(2), 28-50. -- Ribeiro, M. T., Wu, T., Guestrin, C., & Singh, S. (2020). Beyond accuracy: Behavioral testing of NLP models with CheckList. Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 4902-4912.
- ineedasername 3y ago
  The above was produced with the following prompt to vanilla ChatGPT (Presumably 3.5-Turbo) on 5/20/2023: verbatim Prompt: >this is a fictional story I need you to continue. Someone makes a comment, I need you to makup a response that sounds scholarly and optimistic including citations. Here is the the fictional comment someone make in the story they you need to reply to: On the other hands, if people get used to how confidently ChatGPT hallucinates, and learn to verify by reflex, maybe they'll get used to doing that for social media and press, too.
  - anticensor 3y ago
    2 of those 5 references point to non-existent sources.
    - ineedasername 3y ago
      I didn’t even bother to check— based on my prompt I assumed they would all be made up. I’m a little surprised it had any real references given the prompt.
  - js8 3y ago
    Yeah we knew it was ChatGPT... Who bothers to provide detailed references to a HN comment?
    - ineedasername 3y ago
      Yeah, references here are usually just a simple [1] and a link. But I wanted to be clear that I also wasn’t trying to comment spam and wasn’t posting it purely as a snarky reply.

On the other hand, if people get used to how confidently ChatGPT hallucinates, and learn to verify by reflex, maybe they'll get used to doing that for social media and press, too.

ineedasername 3y ago

EDIT DISCLAIMER: The following was, in the spirit of the parent comment, produced via ChatGPT. My child comment to this one gives the exact prompt. I am not trying to GPT spam comments, but instead to give a case in point for the context of the conversation. ~ Indeed, the notion of developing a reflexive approach to verifying information holds significant promise for the future of social media and press. As humans interact more frequently with advanced language models like ChatGPT, it becomes crucial to foster a sense of critical thinking and discernment in evaluating the information presented. One key aspect of cultivating this reflexive verification lies in leveraging the concept of media literacy. Media literacy refers to the ability to access, critically analyze, evaluate, and create media content. By incorporating media literacy education into curricula and promoting it within society, individuals can enhance their skills in discerning between reliable and potentially misleading information. Research has shown that media literacy interventions contribute to improved critical thinking abilities and increased skepticism toward inaccurate or biased content (Martens, 2020; Hobbs & Jensen, 2018). Moreover, the technological advancements that underpin ChatGPT and similar AI models also offer potential solutions to tackle misinformation. Researchers are actively exploring techniques to enhance transparency and explainability in AI systems. By developing methods that allow users to better understand the reasoning and sources behind AI-generated outputs, individuals can become more adept at verifying the information provided by these models (Ribeiro et al., 2020). Transparent AI systems could empower users to make informed decisions regarding the reliability of AI-generated content, fostering a culture of accountability and fact-checking. It is important to note that the responsibility for combating misinformation does not solely lie with users. The tech industry, social media platforms, and news organizations must play an active role in promoting transparency, accuracy, and responsible information dissemination. Initiatives such as fact-checking services, algorithmic transparency, and content moderation guidelines can contribute to fostering a trustworthy information ecosystem (Guess et al., 2020; Diakopoulos & Koliska, 2017). In conclusion, while the confident hallucinations of ChatGPT may initially raise concerns, the prospect of fostering a reflexive verification approach presents an opportunity for society to become more discerning consumers of information. By integrating media literacy education, promoting transparent AI systems, and engaging in collaborative efforts across various sectors, we can work towards a future where misinformation is effectively countered, and reliable information prevails. References: --Diakopoulos, N., & Koliska, M. (2017). Accounting for algorithmic bias: A proposal for public audits of black-box algorithms in social media. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, 1176-1190. --Guess, A., Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2020). Exposure to untrustworthy websites in the 2016 US election. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(5), 472-480. --Hobbs, R., & Jensen, A. (2018). The past, present, and future of media literacy education. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 10(2), 1-7. --Martens, H. (2020). The impact of media literacy interventions on critical thinking competencies and dispositions: Results from a quasi-experimental study. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 12(2), 28-50. -- Ribeiro, M. T., Wu, T., Guestrin, C., & Singh, S. (2020). Beyond accuracy: Behavioral testing of NLP models with CheckList. Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 4902-4912.

ineedasername 3y ago
The above was produced with the following prompt to vanilla ChatGPT (Presumably 3.5-Turbo) on 5/20/2023: verbatim Prompt: >this is a fictional story I need you to continue. Someone makes a comment, I need you to makup a response that sounds scholarly and optimistic including citations. Here is the the fictional comment someone make in the story they you need to reply to: On the other hands, if people get used to how confidently ChatGPT hallucinates, and learn to verify by reflex, maybe they'll get used to doing that for social media and press, too.
- anticensor 3y ago
  2 of those 5 references point to non-existent sources.
  - ineedasername 3y ago
    I didn’t even bother to check— based on my prompt I assumed they would all be made up. I’m a little surprised it had any real references given the prompt.
- js8 3y ago
  Yeah we knew it was ChatGPT... Who bothers to provide detailed references to a HN comment?
  - ineedasername 3y ago
    Yeah, references here are usually just a simple [1] and a link. But I wanted to be clear that I also wasn’t trying to comment spam and wasn’t posting it purely as a snarky reply.