4 ms·
Havent read the whole thing, but the first 2 show a lack of experience w "prompt engineering". To get it to write a conversation, either lead it in: > Donald K
by sdwr 3y ago
Havent read the whole thing, but the first 2 show a lack of experience w "prompt engineering". To get it to write a conversation, either lead it in:
> Donald Knuth: So, Steve, what do you think about ChatGPT?
Steven Wolfram:
or be direct and specific:
> Simulate a conversation between SW and DK about ChatGPT.
Neither will get a good response though. ChatGPT very much struggles with tone and natural dialogue. The answers will weave in facts about the two, but not capture their perspective or tone very well.
- dmbche 3y agoYou should read the rest - it doesn't even try to simulate a conversation
- luispauloml 3y agoWhat you perceived as "lack of experience" was actually result of well pondered decisions by Knuth when crafting his questions.
- adrianmonk 3y agoAside from that, you can also pose the question to make it clear that an invented conversation is what you're after. This phrasing actually works: "What might Donald Knuth say to Stephen Wolfram about chatGPT if they had a conversation about it?"