Idk what definition of "semantic web" you have in mind, but AFAIK, it usually relies labeling words and names, and adding some vague relations. That's not enoug

Idk what definition of "semantic web" you have in mind, but AFAIK, it usually relies labeling words and names, and adding some vague relations. That's not enough. You can't build enough, inspectable, correct knowledge that way. Sure, you can list genealogical trees and and the components of a car, but it won't help you one bit when someone asks "give the five most important things about XML in gangsta rap style" (0), because none of the needed knowledge can be represented in any form of semantic web I've seen, and there isn't an engine capable of running the required inferences. [0] https://libreddit.de/r/ProgrammerHumor/comments/13lgv3u/chatgpt_in_gangster_rap_style_give_the_top_five/ https://libreddit.de/r/ProgrammerHumor/comments/13lgv3u/chat... You may think that's a joke, but from the performance perspective, it's utterly impressive. Summarizing a paper is even more impressive, and is equally far outside the scope of the semantic web.