I think I reached a point where I get allergic to discussions around capital A-gile "methodologies" about this or that subtrait of one method® that got reused a

I think I reached a point where I get allergic to discussions around capital A-gile "methodologies" about this or that subtrait of one method® that got reused and bastardized by the general public, where most arguments revolve around a combination of semantics, history, and quotation of public figures. It's spelled out in the name of the manifesto. How much more clearer can it be made? The thing is not even two pages long, and yet there are probably less people who read it than there are certified practitioners of this or that process supposedly bringing it to you - where the situation is now about arguing whether some random artifact best conveys a backlog item (won't even get there, you already lost) or requirements (face to face conversation much?). Lost cause.