5 ms·
that already is a weapon. as an example, they believe a low power version is what was used in havana.
by jiveturkey 3y ago
that already is a weapon. as an example, they believe a low power version is what was used in havana.
- reilly3000 3y agoCame to say this. It’s not a big mystery like the news keeps saying it is. How can one defend against this?
- Firmwarrior 3y agoTinfoil hat lining
- alasdair_ 3y agoPlease make a tinfoil hat and cook it in your microwave and let us know how it goes.
- verdverm 3y agoThe latest I heard about Havana is they believe that to not be the case any more. There are however crowd control versions for anti-riot purposes. They induce a burning feeling on the skin without permanent damage, supposedly.
- smegger001 3y agoI wonder who is doing the studies to prove no long term harm.
- Eisenstein 3y agoHow would non-ionizing radiation that doesn't cause an acute injury result in long term harm? I would assume that you would need to propose a mechanism for it to happen, rather than try and prove a negative.
- smegger001 3y agoheat induced denaturing of proteins?
- bee_rider 3y agoIt is lower frequency than visible light, so, of course burning things is harmful but we’re not talking about ionizing radiation.
- smegger001 3y agowell if is actually heating the skin it could denature proteins? that can happen at a little 105 degree F. your body operates in the mid 90s naturally if its hot out it wouldn't take much added energy to push you over the limit. EDIT a quick wikipedai search says it can heat the skin to 111 degree F so yeah it could easily do damage.