6 ms·
Adobe Firefly already did it https://www.adobe.com/sensei/generative-ai/firefly.html https://www.adobe.com/sensei/generative-ai/firefly.html
by jahewson 3y ago
Adobe Firefly already did it https://www.adobe.com/sensei/generative-ai/firefly.html https://www.adobe.com/sensei/generative-ai/firefly.html
- Giorgi 3y agoAdobe AI is a crap compared to Midjourney
- belter 3y agoBecause one is on proper stock art and the other on anything without asking the creators for authorization? "AI art tools Stable Diffusion and Midjourney targeted with copyright lawsuit" - https://www.theverge.com/2023/1/16/23557098/generative-ai-art-copyright-legal-lawsuit-stable-diffusion-midjourney-deviantart https://www.theverge.com/2023/1/16/23557098/generative-ai-ar...
- flangola7 3y agoSearch on Twitter, the artists in the Adobe dataset are also livid (justifiably) because they didn't consent to their work being used for AI training. The Adobe license agreement is broad enough that Adobe is covered legally, but it isn't enthusiastic consent in any sense of the word. Many, many artists would never have submitted their work to Adobe if generative AI had been a known possibility, so using Adobe's product is really not any better at respecting creators' wishes.
- cyanydeez 3y agoSo like two drunk people having sex and the law trying to figure out who consented
- Der_Einzige 3y agoMidjourney is crap compared to stable diffusion with all the features in automatic1111
- echelon 3y agoIt's trained on their stock art and under-performs Stable Diffusion and Midjourney. It's really poor, comparatively.
- cubefox 3y agoIt makes way fewer visual mistakes (like wrong number of limbs) than Stable Diffusion, or even Bing Dall-E ~3. The latter is still the best at understanding your prompt though.