3 ms·
Apollo was feasible because there was a very real risk of the entire USA being destroyed and every voter knew it. It was a race to technological and military su
by chasd00 3y ago
Apollo was feasible because there was a very real risk of the entire USA being destroyed and every voter knew it. It was a race to technological and military superiority against the USSR and the Apollo program was a big part of that. That existential fear and risk doesn't exist today, there is no appetite for that level of commitment in the general population. AOC herself could kill a program proposal like Apollo with a single tweet about proposed bathroom door labels.
- nameistaken 3y ago> AOC herself could kill a program proposal like Apollo with a single tweet about proposed bathroom door labels. Hacker News becoming more like reddit every day with trash comments like this.
- pie420 3y agoHacker News was never anything more than a subreddit for elitist silicon valley VCs and FAANG programmers with 35 hours of free time per week.
- 93po 3y agohttps://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html > Please don't post comments saying that HN is turning into Reddit. It's a semi-noob illusion, as old as the hills.
- chrisco255 3y agoThe lunar mission did not yield any kind of advanced military capabilities, though. We had cooperative space missions with the Soviets as early as 1975, when the Apollo program was still ongoing. See Apollo–Soyuz: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo%E2%80%93Soyuz https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo%E2%80%93Soyuz
- Gunnerhead 3y agoI can’t believe this is the first time I learn about this. How interesting!