4 ms·
LangChain has moved fast and made a decent first pass at a solution to the problem of LLM orchestration. But I'm skeptical that the first solution will be the b
by chatmasta 3y ago
LangChain has moved fast and made a decent first pass at a solution to the problem of LLM orchestration. But I'm skeptical that the first solution will be the best solution, and we should keep an open mind to other approaches.
Personally, I like the more declarative approach that Microsoft is taking with guidance [0]. The two projects are not substitutable at the moment, and might even complement each other, but I'm weary of building a new ecosystem on a possibly overly-complicated first pass solution to the orchestration problem.
[0] https://github.com/microsoft/guidance https://github.com/microsoft/guidance
- anish_m 3y agoResonate with the assessment. I like guidance too so far, but the dev community is far behind langchain. One big problem I have with langchain is that there are too many wrappers, and its often very confusing what little additional functionality each wrapper is adding up.
- rahimnathwani 3y agos/weary/wary
- chatmasta 3y agoDamn, I'm weary of making that mistake so often. Thanks :)
- brianjking 3y agoYeah, there are so many platforms out there. It is incredibly tough to figure out who will be heading in the right direction. - https://shreyar.github.io/guardrails/ https://shreyar.github.io/guardrails/ - https://github.com/NVIDIA/NeMo-Guardrails https://github.com/NVIDIA/NeMo-Guardrails - https://www.askmarvin.ai/ https://www.askmarvin.ai/