The precedent the Supreme Court actually set here is somewhat interesting. If the work had been used to advertise a magazine issue about Andy Warhol, there may

The precedent the Supreme Court actually set here is somewhat interesting. If the work had been used to advertise a magazine issue about Andy Warhol, there may have been grounds for fair use. But because it was an issue about Prince, stealing another artists' work and slapping colors on it doesn't excuse you for not crediting them.