That's certainly an interpretation of things, but it runs afoul of an issue where you'd force the Supreme Court to legislate acceptable types of content suggest

That's certainly an interpretation of things, but it runs afoul of an issue where you'd force the Supreme Court to legislate acceptable types of content suggestion. Is a forum showing you the most upvoted (reddit's /top) or the most recently commented (phpBB), or some combination (HN and reddit's /hot) and saying "you may like {{most popular thing}}" the site's speech or the user's? Is it only the site's speech if the recommendation is personalized? Or if the recommendation is a single item, and not a list? The court's 230 interpretation today[*] seems to be that suggesting or promoting user-content isn't itself site content, which is fairly in-line with the original intent of the law (that showing, and even ordering user-content isn't site-content). [*]: Which as others mentioned, is totally independent of this ruling.