4 ms·
Classic zero sum thinking with no evidence or even an overarching thesis on the neutrality of money. You need to back this up with some serious economic citati
by abigail95 3y ago
Classic zero sum thinking with no evidence or even an overarching thesis on the neutrality of money.
You need to back this up with some serious economic citations
- JumpinJack_Cash 3y ago> > Classic zero sum thinking All the stuff that gives the most satisfaction is zero sum. Only one team wins the Super Bowl, only one NBA team wins the Finals and only one franchise gets to claim the World Series. You can see it when you look at investors, even the notorious ones, they are rich but mentally they are not stoked or feeling as powerful as athletes who won such trophies.
- abigail95 3y agoWhat the fuck are you talking about?
- kneebonian 3y agoLike having children or helping another person. Totally 0 sum.
- MaulingMonkey 3y ago> Based on the NFL's collective bargaining agreement, players on the winning team in Super Bowl LVII will receive $157,000 apiece. Players on the losing team receive $82,000 per player. [...] https://www.kare11.com/article/sports/nfl/superbowl/how-much-money-nfl-players-make-super-bowl/507-97f2c908-bb5b-43ed-b420-4fc14d91e5f0 https://www.kare11.com/article/sports/nfl/superbowl/how-much... To say nothing of pay and fame - presumably translating to better marketing deals and salaries from improved negotiation positions for simply getting as far as the Super Bowl. Absent other conditions (e.g. worries about exacerbating injuries), chances are you'd show up even if you know you'll lose, and not just out of spite and wanting to make the other guys work for it - but because you'll gain from it, which is a bit counter to the whole "zero sum" thing. Plenty of sport where new records are exciting even when it's simply beating the previous ones.