3 ms·
> If trade deals were passed like legislation in a parliament or Congress, with time in committee and lots of room for individual legislators to add their input
by Bran_son 3y ago
> If trade deals were passed like legislation in a parliament or Congress, with time in committee and lots of room for individual legislators to add their input
You're conflating transparency with the process. The deals could be negotiated same as now, but without the secrecy. Though I have to say I find the idea that transparency would increase corruption rather novel.
- hash872 3y agoI mean, I think the word 'corruption' is being over-used here. But discussions about say tax rates or agricultural subsidies follow the normal legislative process. Do you feel like these issues are being handled optimally now? It just gives a huge attack surface for lobbyists and rent-seekers to complain and whine and get their way. If the trade deal went through the 'normal' legislative process, every rep with a bit of leverage would hold it hostage for the pet industry or major employer in their district. "I won't sign off on this bill until we have a special carveout for Local Industry!" etc. etc.
- Bran_son 3y ago> It just gives a huge attack surface for lobbyists and rent-seekers to complain and whine and get their way. Lobbyists and rent-seekers are the ones writing trade deals.