4 ms·
without watching the video that sounds .... not straightforward. It sounds like you've dupliacted a chatGPT interface and then... i dunno added a way to draw li
by masukomi 3y ago
without watching the video that sounds .... not straightforward. It sounds like you've dupliacted a chatGPT interface and then... i dunno added a way to draw lines between answers?
The elevator pitch for this really needs work. Like Maybe a simple screenshot of the result + a description of the bits that aren't obvious from that would be helpful on the site.
hopefully constructive suggestions:
> NodePad is a simple LLM-assisted brainstorming experiment designed to help you quickly capture ideas, expand on them, question them, and organize them visually!
a) don't care if it's LLM assisted. and only geeks know what LLM means. I care if it's going to intelligently help me
b) "x is a brainstorming experiment" means that x is a brainstorming experiment NOT that x is an experiment that helps you brainstorm. These are very different things. I think you mean "NotePad is an experiment that uses AI to help you brainstorm"
c) organize them visually could mean literally anything with a visual component. You gotta give me more words or a screenshot.
- TeMPOraL 3y ago> without watching the video that sounds .... not straightforward. It sounds like you've dupliacted a chatGPT interface and then... i dunno added a way to draw lines between answers? IDK, if someone did just that, I'd happily pay for it - especially if those answers and lines formed a DAG, offering a nice interface to fork and merge conversations.
- kayyalims 3y agoThanks, agreed makes a lot more sense to present it this way. I think I was trying to explain a lot of ideas I had while working on this to a point where things became either redundant of not helpful. I'll adjust the about section.
- cush 3y ago> without watching the video that sounds .... not straightforward Have you considered.... watching the video?
- masukomi 3y agohave you considered... considering the context of my response? the discussion i was responding to was about the contents of the page PRIOR to watching the video so the comments were made as feedback based on what a reader sees BEFORE watching the video. Watching the video would have a) polluted the honest feedback about what a user saw when encountering the page and trying to decide if watching the video was worth the time b) been !@@#$!@ irrelevant to the discussion of what one thinks BEFORE watching the video.
- cush 3y agoI feel like you may be overreacting and also missed a bit: OP: > Video opens with an explanation of LLMs.