3 ms·

Its not funny. Its accurate. Roads are more decentralized than trains. Your argument is anti-scientific in a way. We see in nature that decentralized systems a

• woodruffw 3y ago
  My point was that they're "decentralized" in the least interesting way: they exist as a "decentralized" structure only by overwhelming centralized effort. Calling them decentralized is like calling suburbia decentralized: it's not even wrong. Decentralization is not a virtue (or end) in itself when it comes to public infrastructure. Robustness is also not intrinsically tied to it, and there are a variety of senses in which the American road network is not particularly robust: congestion and unsustainable funding schemes are just the first two that come to mind.
  • mwbajor 3y ago
    " in the least interesting way" Who cares about being interesting, I can go around outages in the network with a car where trains can't. You should be arguing for smaller cars not less of them.
    • woodruffw 3y ago
      > Who cares about being interesting, I can go around outages in the network with a car where trains can't. You, ostensibly[1]! > You should be arguing for smaller cars not less of them. I'd be more than happy to take both :-) [1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html