From what I recall, AGI was at first meant to be an intelligence on par with human intelligence in every way. It's supposed to do *at least* everything a human

From what I recall, AGI was at first meant to be an intelligence on par with human intelligence in every way. It's supposed to do *at least* everything a human can. It seems as the recent wave of AI hit the public, the human component is deemphasized and the term "general" is more broad. I've seen the term "true AGI" used to disambiguate this so GPT-4 may show sparks of AGI, but no signs of true AGI.