3 ms·
I think this might be just because their comment is borderline useless - it is so condensed that one can hardly make any sense of it. So what did they want to
by _Microft 3y ago
I think this might be just because their comment is borderline useless - it is so condensed that one can hardly make any sense of it.
So what did they want to say? Is it "Science, it works?" like in XKCD comic #54? Or are the quotes around science the actually important thing, casting doubt on it? It's hard to tell because they did not bother to spend a few seconds to actually write it out.
Beside that there is more to papers than just their abstract. If you are curious, you can check section "Global LWS trends and drivers" for the answers to your questions.
- paiute 3y agoThe intention was to get people to read the main thesis critically. That quote is sort of a tell about the quality of this paper, and the more I dig into this paper the more it confirms this is isn't good science.
- dahart 3y agoYour comments seem more skeptical than critical. Are you saying you believe lakes aren’t losing volume?
- showdeadplease 3y ago[dead]
- anigbrowl 3y agoMaybe if you had articulated your objections up front instead of posturing, your subthread wouldn't now be sitting at the bottom of the page.