3 ms·
Thank you very much Vlad for taking the time to comment so thoroughly. 4. The kerning point is a good one - we'll work on that. 5. The original is photoshop
by gibsonf1 19y ago
Thank you very much Vlad for taking the time to comment so thoroughly.
4. The kerning point is a good one - we'll work on that.
5. The original is photoshop text (scalable), but saved as jpg because the gif with transparency had terrible aliasing.
8. Hmm, this one I don't know how to respond to as you object to using meaning for the fonts. Facebook and Google, do they have cohesion between the meaning?
9. One color fonts are used a lot in logos. (Our prior version had 2 colors)
11. Cheap is definitely bad.
12. Hmm
13. The kerning is easy to fix
14. We are fixing that
15. ok
16. I had no idea about the focus-brand logo. The Ottawa font is my favorite font - I use it for all of my firm's correspondence. I found it in 1995 actually - it is beautiful and very easy to read. The font used for the Focus brand logo is quite different - definitely not as elegant as Ottawa.
- bls 19y agoDon't use purple unless you want a strong association with Sun Microsystems. The Favicon doesn't match the logo. The website looks like a weblog--that is not a good thing. Honestly, there are a lot of problems with the site design. I am not a designer so I can't offer anything constructive. You need some professional help.