The most important part of the article is at the bottom, google's response when questioned about it: > "The risk of confusion between domain names and file nam

The most important part of the article is at the bottom, google's response when questioned about it: > "The risk of confusion between domain names and file names is not a new one. For example, 3M’s Command products use the domain name command.com, which is also an important program on MS DOS and early versions of Windows. Applications have mitigations for this (such as Google Safe Browsing), and these mitigations will hold true for TLD’s such as .zip. > At the same time, new namespaces provide expanded opportunities for naming such as community.zip and url.zip. Google takes phishing and malware seriously and Google Registry has existing mechanisms to suspend or remove malicious domains across all of our TLDs, including .zip. We will continue to monitor the usage of .zip and other TLDs and if new threats emerge we will take appropriate action to protect users." - Google. Good thing google never gets any of this stuff wrong, and has a great appeal process for people flagged in error /s