3 ms·
A similar question also convinced me that there's a there there at first. But then I also tried asking GPT3/4 to play tic tac toe. That ended in epic failure.
by Kim_Bruning 3y ago
A similar question also convinced me that there's a there there at first. But then
I also tried asking GPT3/4 to play tic tac toe. That ended in epic failure.
Now I'm wondering what the difference is between these two tasks.
- sharemywin 3y agoI played it and made the wrong move and it still said I won.
- Kim_Bruning 3y agoSee if you can get it to play better within your particular context even. I couldn't get it to improve!
- Kim_Bruning 3y agoI think switching to GPT-4 I managed to get it to learn by playing itself, and helping out and explaining when that went wrong. I did hit the usage cap though. Would not recommend trying to teach it Global Thermonuclear War at this time.
- blibble 3y agoone was in the training set and one wasn't
- Kim_Bruning 3y agoIt stands to reason that tic tac toe would be in the training set, but a random stack of objects wouldn't.
- Philadelphia 3y agoHow many people play text tic-tic-toe on the internet? Puzzle questions would seem more common.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- superturkey650 3y agoThat’s interesting. I just played a game with ChatGPT4 and it went smoothly. It gave me the rules, managed the game board, and let me know when I made an invalid move.
- ldhough 3y agoSome games go smoothly, some don't (occasionally it plays impossible moves or plays after I've already won, although not often). Even when games go smoothly, it seems to play very poorly even when told to win and even when I told it to explain the optimal tic-tac-toe strategy in advance. While it is pretty impressive that it can play at all, it does make me think its intelligence is a bit less generalized and/or "human" than some people think. I think any human that can play chess to the level GPT4 can (apparently pretty high) would easily be able to figure out tic-tac-toe, even without our equivalent of "training data."